Lawmakers Criticize Florida Attorney General Over Handling of Epstein Files

February 11, 2026 • Al Jazeera

Lawmakers Criticize Florida Attorney General Over Handling of Epstein Files

US Attorney General Pam Bondi Faces Criticism Over Handling of Epstein-Related Documents

A hearing before the House Judiciary Committee has focused attention on the handling of documents related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein by US Attorney General Pam Bondi. The committee’s primary concern is the heavy redactions made in the released files, which have raised questions about the administration’s transparency.

During the hearing, Democratic lawmakers criticized Bondi for her handling of the files, with Representative Jamie Raskin stating that she appears to be siding with perpetrators and ignoring victims. Women who had come forward as survivors of Epstein’s alleged sex-trafficking ring and their families attended the hearing, including Teresa Helm, Jess Michaels, and Lara Blume McGee.

The Trump administration has faced questions about its decision to withhold or redact documents related to Epstein since the start of President Donald Trump’s second term. The administration has also been criticized for not meeting with survivors and for heavy redaction in the released files. Representative Pramila Jayapal asked Bondi to apologize to Epstein’s victims, stating that her department has shown a pattern of redacting the names of powerful predators.

Bondi responded harshly to criticism, accusing Republican Representative Thomas Massie of having “Trump derangement syndrome.” When asked about investigating Trump’s links to Epstein, Bondi stated that Democrats were using the issue to deflect from other accomplishments by President Trump. The House Judiciary Committee has been scrutinizing the handling of the Epstein files under a new law, known as the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which requires the Justice Department to publish all relevant documents in an easily searchable format.

The law allows for some limited redaction to protect victim identities but critics argue that many documents have been published with heavy redactions. The hearing has highlighted concerns about transparency and accountability within the US Department of Justice.

Source: Al Jazeera